In Behind the Whistle, former Premier League and EFL referee Chris Foy goes by way of a collection of key match selections from the newest Sky Wager League One and League Two motion.
Behind the Whistle goals to present supporters of EFL golf equipment an perception into the decision-making concerns and in addition clarification of sure calls to offer an understanding of how the legal guidelines of the sport are interpreted.
As a part of an everyday characteristic on Sky Sports activities following the conclusion of a matchday, Foy will likely be right here to run you thru some refereeing issues within the EFL…
Blackpool 4-0 Shrewsbury Town
Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant
Blackpool’s aim stood following a melee within the field, however Shrewsbury gamers imagine that there was a handball
Incident: Objective scored – Potential handball (Blackpool)
Determination: Objective awarded (Blackpool)
Foy says: This explicit incident is in relation to a possible handball towards the Blackpool goalscorer instantly earlier than the aim is scored.
If the ball goes instantly into aim or the attacker scores instantly after the ball has made contact with their arm, even when unintentional the aim will likely be disallowed.
It’s a troublesome determination to make in actual time. Even with the advantage of trying on the replays, I do not imagine there may be any conclusive proof to indicate whether or not the ball really makes contact with the arm, unintentionally or in any other case, and due to this fact the referee was appropriate to award the aim.
Harrogate Town 1-1 Swindon Town
Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant
Swindon City had a aim disallowed following a foul on Harrogate City’s goalkeeper. Have been they laborious achieved by?
Incident: Objective scored – Potential foul (Harrogate City)
Determination: Objective disallowed – foul on the goalkeeper (Harrogate City)
Foy says: There may be actually contact between the attacking participant and the goalkeeper, initially when the ball is making its method into the field after which additional contact when leaping for the ball.
I believe on condition that the attackers’ arms are in an upward place and impeding the goalkeeper’s skill to take the ball, the choice to disallow the aim is one I imagine is the proper name.
Notts County 4-2 Bradford City
Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant
Notts County’s aim towards Bradford Metropolis was awarded following an offside shout
Incident: Objective scored – Potential offside (Notts County)
Determination: Objective awarded (Notts County)
Foy says: A very good determination from the assistant referee to maintain his flag down on this event, with the aim being awarded the proper name.
On this event, the six-yard line offers us a transparent indication {that a} defending participant is barely deeper into the field than the aim scorer.
Stockport County 2-0 Colchester United
Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant
A Stockport County participant demanded a penalty following a shirt pull within the field of their conflict with Colchester
Incident: Potential penalty (Stockport County)
Determination: No penalty awarded (Stockport County)
Foy says: The referee has to guage on this state of affairs whether it is regular soccer contact between the defender and the attacker, however I believe this exceeds that threshold.
I imagine the shirt pull is obvious and sustained holding that instantly impacts the attacker’s skill to get his shot away, due to this fact I believe the higher final result would have been to award a penalty kick on this occasion.
