The VAR who reviewed the penalty awarded to PSG towards Newcastle for a controversial handball has been stood down from his recreation on Wednesday, Sky Sports activities Information understands.
Tomasz Kwiatkowski requested referee Szymon Marciniak to go to the display screen after the assessment which regarded into a possible handball by Tino Livramento – the referee didn’t give the penalty on-field, however reversed the choice after trying on the incident on the display screen.
Kwiatkowski was as a result of be the VAR in Wednesday’s Champions League recreation between Actual Sociedad and Salzburg however has now been changed.
Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant
Newcastle supervisor Eddie Howe says VAR’s choice to award a penalty to PSG was ‘poor’ after it price his facet a well-known victory and left their Champions League hopes out of their arms
Newcastle heading for a well-known 1-0 win on the Parc des Princes till the penalty was awarded towards Tino Livramento, permitting Kylian Mbappe to stage within the eighth and remaining minute of added time.
Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant
Tim Sherwood and the Soccer Particular panel are incensed as PSG are awarded a late penalty for an obvious handball from Tino Livramento
Talking on Soccer Particular, former Spurs supervisor Tim Sherwood labelled the choice “disgusting” whereas Newcastle boss Eddie Howe mentioned referee Marciniak ought to have been stronger to ignore Kwiatkowski’s recommendation.
Howe mentioned in a tv interview the referee had been positioned below “extreme” strain by the PSG gamers, and later labelled a call which price his facet two valuable factors “poor” in his post-match press convention.
Had Newcastle gained within the French capital they’d have had their Champions League future in their very own arms, however now should beat AC Milan of their remaining group recreation and hope Dortmund get at the least a degree towards PSG to progress to the knockout phases.
What’s the handball legislation?
IFAB, who set out the legal guidelines of world soccer, have laid out tips on what does and does not represent a handball offence – although leagues even have their very own particular person interpretations, which you’ll be able to learn beneath.
Extra usually, for the needs of figuring out handball offences, the higher boundary of the arm is in keeping with the underside of the armpit. Not each contact of a participant’s hand/arm with the ball is an offence.
It’s an offence if a participant:
- intentionally touches the ball with their hand/arm, for instance shifting the hand/arm in the direction of the ball
- touches the ball with their hand/arm when it has made their physique unnaturally larger. A participant is taken into account to have made their physique unnaturally larger when the place of their hand/arm is just not a consequence of, or justifiable by, the participant’s physique motion for that particular scenario. By having their hand/arm in such a place, the participant takes a threat of their hand/arm being hit by the ball and being penalised
- scores within the opponents’ aim: Immediately from their hand/arm, even when unintended, together with by the goalkeeper or instantly after the ball has touched their hand/arm, even when unintended
Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant
Newcastle United’s Nick Pope offers his opinion on the penalty given towards his facet throughout their Champions League match at PSG
But extra handball frustration?
Handball has been a difficulty from a Premier League perspective for a very long time – simply look again to the Covid-hit 2020/21 season when issues grew to become so dangerous that the interpretation of the foundations was modified mid-season, after which rewritten for the next marketing campaign.
However that didn’t resolve the issue. The penalty Jack Grealish conceded in final season’s FA Cup remaining was equally contentious, however maybe probably the most placing of all was the one awarded to Luton towards Wolves within the Premier League earlier this marketing campaign, with Joao Gomes penalised when the ball deflected off his leg and onto his raised arm.
Wolves supervisor Gary O’Neil mentioned that was “never, ever” a penalty whereas former Premier League referee and VAR official Mike Dean agreed it was a harsh choice – regardless of the ‘unnatural’ place of Gomes’ arm.
“I have no idea why that’s not been overturned by VAR,” Dean mentioned on Soccer Saturday on the time.
Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant
Tim Sherwood and Mike Dean fume over the choice to award Luton a penalty towards Wolves after Joao Gomes was adjudged to have dealt with the ball.
Evaluation: Surprising name denies Newcastle
Sky Sports activities’ Adam Bate:
Paris Saint-Germain scored with their thirtieth shot of the sport and numerous these had been clear alternatives so Newcastle might nicely have been punished sooner than they had been. Nevertheless it was the style of the equaliser, a present from the officers, that can so grate.
Mbappe didn’t breach the Newcastle again line with a little bit of brilliance. He was handed the ball and capable of convert from the penalty spot not due to a Newcastle error both. Only a desperately merciless penalty name that required a VAR assessment to make it occur.
The choice to award a spot-kick for the ball placing Livramento’s arm after bouncing there by way of his chest would have been inexplicable regardless – there was nothing unnatural about his physique form. It’s known as working. Nevertheless it was even stranger given earlier occasions.
