Henry Kissinger, the polarizing diplomat who died on Wednesday at 100, obtained copious distinctions over his lengthy profession. However one of the crucial uncommon — an honor that was additionally damning — got here in 1987, when he joined Mozart’s Figaro and Puccini’s Tosca as a personality in an opera.
“Nixon in China,” composed by John Adams and directed by Peter Sellars, with a libretto by Alice Goodman, was impressed by President Richard M. Nixon’s epoch-making 1972 journey to China. Kissinger’s secret shuttling had paved the best way for the go to, which helped normalize relations between the 2 nations after an extended interval with out diplomatic ties.
When the opera premiered, it was nonetheless a contemporary notion that this artwork kind, so related to the legendary, might deal with latest historical past — and deal with it not as satire, however as a unusually transferring mixture of grandeur, humor and tenderness. “Nixon in China” isn’t a practical account of the journey, however a stylized fantasia on it.
As opera characters, each Nixon and Mao Zedong are faintly ridiculous and faintly noble, singing of their hopes and goals in Goodman’s enigmatic, evocative traces. And Kissinger — Nixon’s nationwide safety adviser in 1972 and, a 12 months later, his secretary of state, too — is there by their facet, simply as he was in historical past.
“When Peter Sellars proposed the idea of the opera,” Adams mentioned in an interview, “he had just finished reading Kissinger’s ‘White House Years,’ which I seem to recall being pretty pompously self-congratulatory. I think there was some interest in cutting the secretary down to size.”
“Nixon” sought to unlock the ruminative depths beneath the headlines and set-in-stone positions surrounding a much-reported story. (Adams and Sellars would later do the identical in “The Death of Klinghoffer” — one other collaboration with Goodman, a few 1985 cruise ship hijacking by Palestine Liberation Entrance militants — and “Doctor Atomic,” about J. Robert Oppenheimer and the atomic bomb.)
The piece isn’t precisely sympathetic to Nixon, but it surely leaves audiences with a extra poignantly human sense of him. The opera’s Kissinger, although, is rarely actually human; he doesn’t get the publicity of ideas and ambivalence granted to the opposite principal gamers. “He’s not the character we go into great psychological depth with,” Adams mentioned.
He’s not deep, however he’s easy. Within the first scene, because the People arrive, and awkward niceties are exchanged within the type of interjections, fragments and repetitions, Kissinger is the one one who sounds comfy. The function’s bass register provides him sonorous diplomatic suavity; it’s soothing, whereas everybody else sounds strained and anxious.
“He is and always was theatrical,” Sellars mentioned in an interview.
However this veneer comes off within the second act, throughout a fantastic reimagining of the Chinese language Cultural Revolution propaganda ballet “The Red Detachment of Women.” As in “The Mousetrap” from “Hamlet,” actuality and fiction blur: The singer enjoying Kissinger is, with out rationalization, within the ballet as Lao Tzu — right here, in case you didn’t get the message, a tyrant’s sinister chief aide. (“Doesn’t he look like you-know-who!” Pat Nixon exclaims.)
As Lao Tzu, the grounded suavity of the primary act is gone in favor of lascivious, violent extremes; the singer soars into falsetto and, confronted with a rebellious peasant, stutters a cry to “whip her to death.” “I’m here to liaise with the backroom boys,” Kissinger-as-Lao-Tzu sings, “who know how to live.”
“People are a little shocked when he appears as the sadistic overlord,” Sellars mentioned. “But obviously he’s the man who’s responsible for Chile and for the secret bombing of Cambodia — the list of atrocities and acts of unspeakable violence is long. And that lurid stuff is behind the jolly and well-spoken diplomat. The surprise is, as always, no one is just one thing. That is one reason you make operatic characters.”
After the ballet unveils Kissinger’s officiousness as sheer brutality, his remaining moments within the final act are prosaic: “Please, where’s the toilet?” he asks.
And, the libretto tells us, it’s solely after he leaves in the hunt for the lavatory that the Nixons, Mao and his spouse, and Zhou Enlai, the Chinese language premier, can “all enter a state of reverie”: the surreally poetic remaining ensemble, through which the 5 characters muse on their lives, their nations and the destiny of each.
“How much of what we did was good?” Zhou sings close to the tip. That type of self-questioning is wholly absent from the opera’s Kissinger — who, along with his charming however ruthless realpolitik, his fist wrapped in a velvet glove, is the other of interiority, the other of poetry.
Like Nixon, Kissinger knew concerning the opera. However when it lastly arrived on the Metropolitan Opera, in 2011, he handed on seeing it. Adams heard that Kissinger had advised folks: “I believe I have a sense of humor. But it has its limits.”
